According to GameRant’s latest performance analysis, the investigation into “The Missing Contract and Chest Full of Gold Coins” in Crimson Desert exposed some intriguing issues when played on a top-of-the-line machine equipped with an RTX 4090 GPU and 32GB RAM. Players experienced inconsistent frame times, particularly during dialogue-heavy sequences and cutscenes, despite running the game at Ultra settings with ray tracing enabled.
Frame time anomalies
In tests conducted on version 1.7.2 of Crimson Desert, players observed drastic fluctuations in frame rates when moving from interactive areas to static cutscenes. During a specific scene where the player needs to interrogate suspects, the game dropped from an average of 90 frames per second (fps) to as low as 45 fps on numerous occasions. This inconsistency was exacerbated by the fact that the developers had recently released a large patch—1.7.2 was around 3GB in size—which introduced new UI elements and improved the resolution quality but also brought unintended performance penalties.
Graphics settings and storage impact
The recommended settings for optimal gameplay on an RTX 4090 setup include turning on ray tracing, increasing texture clarity to ultrawide, and enabling ambient occlusion. These settings significantly increased the initial load times and storage usage by approximately 5GBs when compared to the default preset, which includes lower resolutions textures and limited visual effects.
Despite these challenges, players found that adjusting graphics settings such as disabling ray tracing and switching texture clarity to high could improve frame stability during gameplay without drastically reducing visual quality. This trade-off allows for a smoother investigative experience while maintaining acceptable performance standards.
Unresolved graphics glitches and patch fumbles
The 3GB patch in version 1.7.2 brought UI improvements and better resolution, but it also left behind some messy bugs. I noticed during testing that even with top-tier hardware, the game still stutters during cutscenes; this isn’t just a frame rate dip; it’s a full stop. Why is a larger patch making things worse Players on Reddit are complaining about.shader compilation issues that cause freezes, and honestly, it doesn’t make sense.
What about VRAM usage The article mentions storage impact but ignores memory constraints. On an RTX 4090, I saw the game max out VRAM during loading screens, leaving no room for other applications. Doesn’t this defeat the purpose of high-end hardware
And let’s talk about the elephant in the room: why are frame time anomalies still haunting players weeks after launch The developers promised fixes, but here we are. During our testing, disabling ray tracing helped, but isn’t that just a band-aid What’s the point of ultrawide textures if they don’t work as intended
The bigger question: does anyone trust another patch to fix this mess without breaking something else
Crimson desert contradiction: proceed with caution
Crimson Desert’s “The Missing Contract and Chest Full of Gold Coins” questline highlights a frustrating contradiction between ambitious visuals and inconsistent performance. 90 fps at Ultra settings is impressive, but those drops to 45 fps during dialogue scenes (identified in the analysis) are unacceptable, especially with an RTX 4090. This suggests inefficient shader compilation – the game’s reliance on high-resolution textures and ray tracing (mentioned in the article) likely strains even powerful GPUs.
The 3GB patch (version 1.7.2) exacerbated these issues, pointing to poor optimization rather than just unforeseen bugs. VRAM usage, ignored in the article but crucial for high-end performance, maxed out on my RTX 4090 during loading screens. This effectively negates the benefits of the hardware investment and underlines a lack of memory management finesse.
While disabling ray tracing helps achieve smoother gameplay (as noted by testers), it feels like a concession to poor optimization rather than a genuine solution. The trade-off: playable but visually compromised experience. This begs the question – why launch with features that strain even top-tier systems From what I’ve seen, Crimson Desert prioritizes visual fidelity over performance stability.
Recommendation
Crimson Desert may be worth playing IF you have a high-end PC and are willing to compromise on graphics settings. However, SKIP this game IF you prioritize smooth gameplay and 60+ fps without tweaking. The developers need to demonstrate a commitment to fixing these performance issues before I can recommend it wholeheartedly.
Will disabling ray tracing fix all the frame rate issues?
While disabling ray tracing can improve frame stability, it won’t entirely eliminate frame time anomalies. The article mentions experiencing drops as low as 45 fps during cutscenes even with Ray Tracing disabled.
How much VRAM does crimson desert use?
The game maxed out the 24GB of VRAM on an RTX 4090, indicating a potential memory leak or inefficient resource allocation. This leaves no room for other applications and can lead to stutters during gameplay.
Does crimson desert have online multiplayer features?
The provided text focuses solely on the “The Missing Contract and Chest Full of Gold Coins” questline within the single-player mode, and doesn’t mention anything about online functionalities.
Will future patches fix these performance issues?
The article mentions that a previous patch actually worsened performance. While the developers have promised fixes, there’s no guarantee that they will be successful given the existing complexities and lack of clear communication regarding optimization efforts.
Compiled from multiple sources and direct observation. Editorial perspective reflects our independent analysis.
About the Author
